Posts: 1
Threads: 1
Joined: Feb 2005
When it comes to anime quality, how does AV or MI perform against FX. Is there a major quality difference?
And what't better, AV or MI (specifically Full Metal Alchemist)?
Posts: 1,791
Threads: 43
Joined: Jul 2004
dhopz Wrote:When it comes to anime quality, how does AV or MI perform against FX. Is there a major quality difference?
And what't better, AV or MI (specifically Full Metal Alchemist)?
Read the reviews...
'The depths of my soul are rooted in dark thoughts. But than we all have darkness and light in us. If we are all light on the outside we are nothing but darkness underneath. There comes a time when the darkness must come to light.'
- Shinobu Sensui -
It is only when you refuse to give in with all your heart that you begin to transcend your humanity. - Alucard
Trade List
R1 Collection
HK Collection
Posts: 1,358
Threads: 17
Joined: Feb 2003
Really it depends on the set. Sometimes they are better than fx, sometimes worse. Honestly overall quality doesn't differ that much between companies, its just that fx was always fastest with the popular R1 rips so they got a good name through that.
Exception is MAC who seem to be using some dvd5's lately so I wait for reviews before buying from them now but the rest of the companies if I want it I just buy it (unless there already are negative reviews).
Posts: 185
Threads: 11
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 246
Threads: 5
Joined: Feb 2004
Quality wise, AV is much better than FX. They never had dodgy disc problems like FX did. I don't think I ever heard of anyone having disc problems with AV titles.
Posts: 167
Threads: 32
Joined: Apr 2003
Quote:I don't think I ever heard of anyone having disc problems with AV titles.
Though the actual source that the DVD is based on is another story (TV rips, Engrish subs).
Posts: 2,134
Threads: 23
Joined: Jan 2004
i dont own any AV titles so not sure...aer the packaging the smaller MI/MAC style one or proper DVDcase size like MI or FX ???
Theres the...
Wrong way
the...
Right way
then the...
Rav way!
\m/
Posts: 1,358
Threads: 17
Joined: Feb 2003
AV is proper dvd size like fx. Only MAC has the smaller size.
Posts: 458
Threads: 4
Joined: Sep 2003
AV used to be the ones that printed FX disks and even back then there was some dodgy fx disks. The incidence of dodgy disks is much lower with av, mi & mac though.
Printing on the box sets seems lower with av and mi.
Posts: 2,134
Threads: 23
Joined: Jan 2004
yes Proper siz coz the smaller size just looks plain ol' wired on a shelf mext to proper sized DVDs but thats me just bitchin who really cares
Theres the...
Wrong way
the...
Right way
then the...
Rav way!
\m/
Posts: 396
Threads: 12
Joined: Sep 2004
i never really notice that, but now i do, and it does have a funny look to it.
ahhh, the horror, the horror......
but i think both are ok, not much difference to me, except the size now.
Posts: 78
Threads: 11
Joined: Jul 2003
borrowed the first part from MI.
tv rip, through vhs.
grainy, colourbleed, ghosts.
pure evil.
don't buy it. the fansubbed DTV version is far more superior.
Posts: 2,787
Threads: 139
Joined: Jun 2004
The box size is just another example of why the people running MAC are stupid. If there is an FX set and a MAC set of the same thing, I always took FX cuz the MAC sets look retarded. There's lost sales right there. Now with their dvd-5s I think MACs going to lose a LOT of business.
Posts: 458
Threads: 4
Joined: Sep 2003
The MAC box size is due to shipping considerations since they fit perfect into fed ex boxes. I guess it is all down to moolah in the end.
Posts: 2,787
Threads: 139
Joined: Jun 2004
I doubt they're saving all that much moolah in shipping compaired to lost sales. I know i'm not the only one that passes on MAC when possible simply because of their box size.