05-20-2005, 10:39 AM
Okay lets look at it this way: Base computer tech improves about every six months now only about 1/4 of major computer users actually upgrade every six months, so the 360 which is on a late october early november calender right now will not at all be low-tech and certainly not the ps3 either, the tech is also custom built. Anyway, the ps3 will supposedly be able to link with the psp across the world so security will have to be very tight. The ceel processor is NOT about graphics, its about the behavior of ai and players and what and how they interact and change behavior with one another. Honestly if the games hold up I'll buy both, and the revolution of course. And nvidia and ati are neck and neck no one ever blows the other away, and the tech in the 360 and ps3 is custom so you cant compare them. Anyway does anyone think that if the ps3 pulls through with making that off road racer and killzone look that good if not better than they could dreamcast the 360? Both the ps3 and 360 have removable hard drive the only difference is that the ps3 comes with it and the 360 will have one that does not and one that does. Honestly I use my pc for programming not gaming I prefer consoles so there is no comparison. Consoles are made just for gaming. Are any of you excited about the blue-ray dvd player in the ps3, 360 still has a base player although I think you dont need the remote to play this time.With that player alone they could charge $350 then add all the hardware in the ps3 and ports and removable hdd and you have an expensive system. I stand next toa $400 launch cost, as far as 360 goes I say $300.