01-12-2005, 07:14 AM
I am sorry but i am goign to argue this further. Why you say this just because the numbers are higher? This may be true if everything was the same architecture. The Xbox uses a PIII Celeron process.. nothing changed in it. Which isn't a very good process at all especially in PC's. Second the graphics card isn't all that special.. its rought to about a NVidia geforce 2.5 since nvidia used some of there stuff they learned from making that chip to build the geforce 3.
But what i am saying anymore you can't compare the numbers like you could back in the day. Especially since the ps2 is one of the furthest away from pc like archtechture for the programming aspect. It has alot of power that no one can truely fully tap because of the difficultly programming for it. the Ps2 hands down is the most difficult to program for.. Especially since the Xbox only uses DirectX same as computers do and its really easy if you know progamming to create something in it using the XDX. and apoologies for going way off topic.. I just don't like when people compare numbers straight up when there is many other factors.
But what i am saying anymore you can't compare the numbers like you could back in the day. Especially since the ps2 is one of the furthest away from pc like archtechture for the programming aspect. It has alot of power that no one can truely fully tap because of the difficultly programming for it. the Ps2 hands down is the most difficult to program for.. Especially since the Xbox only uses DirectX same as computers do and its really easy if you know progamming to create something in it using the XDX. and apoologies for going way off topic.. I just don't like when people compare numbers straight up when there is many other factors.