11-01-2004, 03:39 PM
Zagatto Wrote:As an interpretation of Daredevil, I enjoyed the movie. Some of the new ideas presented were excellently done and I just loved seeing Bullseye in action. My biggest joy with the movie was picking out all the inside jokes and references scattered throughout the movie. I'm probably one of the few people who recognized Frank Miller laying on the floor with a pencil in his forehead the first time I saw the movie.
I find Sean Connery to be kind of like Rutger Hauer. Both of them have made some exceptional movies but the majority that they appear in tend to be crap. When they are good, they are very good... unfortunately, there are just too many of the not so good movies for both of them... c'mon who gave the green light to the second Highlander movie?
Who is Rutger Hauer? As for the highlander movies, they are either very forgettable or I
haven't seen them. Its probably the latter as I' remember almost everything ive seen due
to photographic memory. As to the Daredevil movie, I agree some of the changes were
wonderfully done but there were still some that didn't fit. By the way do you ever wonder
what the Matrix trilogy would have been like with Sean Connery in it? I do, ever since I
watched LXG (League of Extrordinary Gentlemen) and learned that he was offered a part
in it. He turned it down because he didn't understand it. Still some of my classic favorites
for Sean include his old James Bond movies. Those are truly classic. Ah well wven great
actors have their offdays but seriousl to be acting to that age. I would so love to do that. I
woul like to see whateveryone else thinks about this.
Ryo of Inferno...Taooo Jiiiinnn