A question for Kerry supporters

[rarnom]

First of all, I think it's safe to say that an attack hasn't happened under his administration (for all of the obvious reasons). That being said, you're blaming Kerry for something that he hasn't said or hasn't happened. My comments were hypothetical. You're comments are blaming him for something that he hasn't done.

As for being different, there is a difference between being slightly different and diametrically opposite.

I did say "IF the situation presented itself", I was being hypothetical. I am not blaming him for anything. I was asking if you Kerry supporters thought he would blame Bush if we did get attacked. As for being 'slightly different and diametricly opposite', seeing how much people hate Bush, I would be surprised they would stand for a candidate who is only 'slightly different'.

After reading your posts I still don't know anything about if YOU think he would blame Bush if we were attacked or take responsibility for his own promises.

So what is it?

Do you, as a Kerry supporter think he will make good on this promise? Do you think that if in the scenario that we get attacked that he will take responsibility and accept blame? Or are you saying that you expect him to pull a 'Bush'?

Can you live with the possibility that the candidate you support is making promises he cannot realistically guarantee?

This is NOT about Bush and Bush's promises. I really want to know how a Kerry supporter can reconcile this behavior. So, again, spare me the crap about how Bush is crap. I know you think Bush is crap.