A question for Kerry supporters

[Elcoholic]

And as far as Bush lying about WMD's, I don't think that it should be called an out and out 'lie'. He was giving information based on what he thought was the truth. He didn't intentionally mislead everyone. Many politicians including Clinton and Kerry have been quoted on record as saying how Sadaam was a 'threat' and that he had WMD's. I thought this was old news anyway...

Also, all due respect mr. elcoholic, but if you are basing all your opinions on 'Farenheit 9/11', you have to realize that that film is not the god's honest truth. Mike Moore is one of the most radical left wing bomb throwers out there. You can't trust him to give a completely unbiased and fully factual account of events. You wanna talk about 'propaganda'? Mike Moore might as well be the Democratic Minister of Propaganda.

.

I'm not basing any of my opinions on farenheit. I just saw it for the first time last saturday and have been in many discussions about this subject before then. I wil admid to be probably one of the most biased posters here. Not at all because I like Kerry since I know next to nothing about him but because I can't believe Bush became president of the most powerfull country in the world. I'm sorry but he comes across like a simple man with a low IQ to me. I strongly feel he can't be trusted and is president for his own and his friends gain. I haven't seen him come across intelegent in any interview. I'd rather have his wife for president since in interviews with them together she acted way more profesional than him.

I know farenheit isn't all true but its a movie of over two hours, full of accusations. I always learned, where there is smoke there is fire. Some of it has to be true. I was especially shocked by the way he portraid the 2000 elections in florida and the Saudi evacuations and connections to the Bush family. Plus, I have seen Moore in interviews defending his movie and he came across as an honest man, a feeling I don't get when I see Bush.

Maybe Kerry is just as bad or worse but he hasn't gotten a chance to prove otherwise. For me Bush has shown his incompetence many times. The fact that he ruined relations with the UN and many countries ways heavily for me since I think globilisation is the way to go to solve all the problems of the world. If we work together we can solve anything.

As far as the WMD goes. Bush shouldn't have said that he knows where they are. He did. Its a lie. And the information, well I don't believe there was any and Bush planned to go to war before 911. Not to long ago I saw the guy from his own administration testifying to, I believe the 911 commision, that he was ordered to find the connection with Iraq no matter what (I think it was the CIA director). Sorry but I forgot his name.

4 Years ago my countries administration handed in their resignation because 4 years earlier they send troops to Kosovo who didn't have the arms and authority needed to protect the region they were assigned to. As a result hundreds of Muslims were deported and murdered and our troops couldn't do anything to stop it. They weren't allowed to use force. After a long investigation it was concluded that the mistake was our countries and my government took responsibility by resigning. I would wish Bush did the same and admited he (would have been different if the UN went allong) went there on false grounds. But I don't see him as the kind of man who takes responsibility and admits his own mistakes (which he doesn't as seen in the third debate).