12-10-2003, 09:30 PM
My assessment of Ranma the series (I've seen season 1 to 4)
Season 1: Excellent! Storylines were great as they focused on the relationships between the characters, the scenarios were not as absurd. All the episodes pretty much had connected storylines too, so it felt like a continuous show.
Season 2: Very Good. Still interesting as it has a few funny story arcs and has Ranma learning the Chestnuts Roasting over an Open Fire technique and Ryoga learning the Breaking Point technique. It also introduced Shampoo's Great Grandmother, Happosai, and Satsuke.
Season 3: Umm Okay I guess...pretty much most of the episodes are not connected story-wise and all feel like filler episodes. Also, some of the scenarios become more absurd and/or repetitive. The only good character that was introduced was Ukyo.
Season 4: Yikes!! By this time they introduce the annoying principal and the pointless episodes become more outlandish. I didn't even bother watching the whole season.
Season 1: Excellent! Storylines were great as they focused on the relationships between the characters, the scenarios were not as absurd. All the episodes pretty much had connected storylines too, so it felt like a continuous show.
Season 2: Very Good. Still interesting as it has a few funny story arcs and has Ranma learning the Chestnuts Roasting over an Open Fire technique and Ryoga learning the Breaking Point technique. It also introduced Shampoo's Great Grandmother, Happosai, and Satsuke.
Season 3: Umm Okay I guess...pretty much most of the episodes are not connected story-wise and all feel like filler episodes. Also, some of the scenarios become more absurd and/or repetitive. The only good character that was introduced was Ukyo.
Season 4: Yikes!! By this time they introduce the annoying principal and the pointless episodes become more outlandish. I didn't even bother watching the whole season.