FX misconceptions
#1
Two titles that I know of, One Piece and .hack//SIGN that are labeled as FX are not.

Both are AV sets. In the review of .hack//SIGN someone said that FX printed the gatefold for AV, which is false. The One Piece set is the exact AV set I have, and I'm guessing someone figured it was FX because the cover picture in the AV part 1 set looks different then the real set.

Anyway, I hope you can move the reviews into the proper set and get rid of the fake sets. While I can't prove it, I think Najica wasn't an FX title either. It seems odd for them to do anything other then an R1 rip, recently.
Reply


Messages In This Thread
FX misconceptions - by dvd_master - 02-15-2004, 11:16 AM
FX misconceptions - by Schultz - 02-15-2004, 01:33 PM
FX misconceptions - by JunkieJoe - 02-15-2004, 02:00 PM
FX misconceptions - by dvd_master - 02-15-2004, 02:00 PM
FX misconceptions - by Vicious - 02-15-2004, 02:45 PM
FX misconceptions - by JunkieJoe - 02-15-2004, 02:47 PM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)