03-29-2006, 01:18 AM
I think its another escape to talk about Clinton attacking Iraq. If you go 1 term back you'll find another beginning and that was Bush sr. invading after the Kuwait thing. Go back further and you'll find the US government giving Sadam weapons to fight Iran. Go back even further and you'll find the US helping Saddam to get to power.
There's alot of history here.
This is where we fundamentaly disagree. I think he IS to blame for any mistake that he signed the order on, shoving responsibility to former administrations is weak and cowardly. Wether invading Iraq, tapping phones, lying about intelegence. HE is responsible for interpreting the inteligence, especially if it's going to cost lives.
If he's not responsible than who is? I honestly (and that's what scares me) think its starting to look like your president can do what he wants since noone is going to hold him accountable anyway. I can't believe someone hasn't stepped up yet and impeached him for going to war to destroy the wmd's which seem to not be there now, costing 50.000 lives and counting. Just ask him the question where are those wmd you PROMISED us were there. Look at some of his speeches before the war started, he's TELLING THE WORLD that their intel is correct. Not a doubt in his mind (or so it seems). That's lying to me.
I think I got most grammer rules down pretty good. I know the difference between they're/ their/ there. But that to and too thing I don't really get. Any easy way to help me remember the difference?
There's alot of history here.
Quote: And no you can't blame bush by himself if you wish to blame him. Blame bad intellegence from his and Clinton's administration. Blame Congress for giving him the money to do what he needs. Bush can't do stuff without congress's partial support. Granted he only needs more then half but still he can't do it by himself. And if you don't like something so much fax your congress man stating your opinion since your representatives and congressmen are suppose to be there to speak for you.
This is where we fundamentaly disagree. I think he IS to blame for any mistake that he signed the order on, shoving responsibility to former administrations is weak and cowardly. Wether invading Iraq, tapping phones, lying about intelegence. HE is responsible for interpreting the inteligence, especially if it's going to cost lives.
If he's not responsible than who is? I honestly (and that's what scares me) think its starting to look like your president can do what he wants since noone is going to hold him accountable anyway. I can't believe someone hasn't stepped up yet and impeached him for going to war to destroy the wmd's which seem to not be there now, costing 50.000 lives and counting. Just ask him the question where are those wmd you PROMISED us were there. Look at some of his speeches before the war started, he's TELLING THE WORLD that their intel is correct. Not a doubt in his mind (or so it seems). That's lying to me.
Quote:Noticed it first when elcoholic used to instead of too then you did it as well. Crazy how poor our grammer can get when typing on the internet.
I think I got most grammer rules down pretty good. I know the difference between they're/ their/ there. But that to and too thing I don't really get. Any easy way to help me remember the difference?