09-21-2005, 08:07 PM
Batz Kage Wrote:Zelda; Hell I think Castlevania: LoI is better, even if it did have bland backgrounds..
I like Dynasty Warriors more; the story is better & the action is in more abundance.
Some might like Onimusha more than Zelda.. It has to many good series against it, & looking back there's no one moemtn where I think "Hey, this memory makes playing the game again seem fun." Although at the time it was the best there was, now it's over shadowed if not in means of gameplay then by means of enjoyment..
Well, you will have to realize that that is you. There are so many more people out there that share the opposite opinion that while it doesn?t make your opinion an invalid one, is does severely over shadow it. You a big fan of the Castlevania obviously, so that will refocus your opinion. But seriously, Dynasty Warriors? That isn't an adventure game first of all, and the game play is desperately shallow by comparison. But beyond the blatant classification flaw is where personal scrutiny enters. I have Onimusha 1-3 and I wouldn't even put them in the same class as LoZ. Three was a good game, but I have not felt a need to finish it. It just sits there, utterly unmotivating. I have played Wind Waker three times. But I hate Halo, so I run chasing my own ass to contradiction almost in saying so.:p My point is this: is there a severely high mass demand, one as great as the one for Twilight Princess, out there for any other adventure game right now? I highly doubt it.