r00ster; for or against - was texhnolyze
#52
hbk101 Wrote:Excuses and excuses. So lame. As I said earlier, don't say things that you have no intention of doing. It makes you nothing but a fraud.

As for on-line trading ettiquette, who made you an expert? As far as I can tell, the responsibility lies on both sellers and buyers equally. Most importantly, it is based on trust. And r00ster broke that trust.

I don't see how anyone can say cidien is being childish. He's justified in complaining. It doesn't matter if they are burned dvds or book of matches. Deals are deals. They are meant to be kept.
Well, I'm not being paid $50, am I Rolleyes ...besides, I said I'd trade him my HK set...

I never claimed to be an expert, all I'm saying is that r00ster has done nothing wrong according to what info we have...which is precisely why Cidien can't complain as he has no real proof in this. Ever hear of "innocent until proven guilty"? Classic case right here.
[Image: 4c1.jpg]
^^Made by Blight

"If teachers were paid more, we'd be able to afford better drugs." -Eikichi Onizuka
Reply


Messages In This Thread
r00ster; for or against - was texhnolyze - by onizuka17711 - 06-24-2005, 09:21 PM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)