r00ster; for or against - was texhnolyze
#46
onizuka17711 Wrote:Precisely, problem solved. It's YOUR fault, because YOU didn't pay him extra for tracking or insurance. You've admitted to being unable to prove him accountable. And put simply, if you were pestering me over something I was not responsible for, I'd ignore you too. Be smarter next time with your money.

As for my logic, if you've never noticed before, item transactions favor the seller. This is so that the sellers don't get ripped off. As a buyer, you are accepting the risks of online transactions. The seller cannot be held responsible for misfortunes they cannot control. As a buyer online, you've disregarded these risks and something happened out of the seller's control. Thus, he owes you nothing and you need to get over it. END OF STORY.
I thought I heard many retarded things, but this eats the cake.

Transaction favors the seller? Let me give you a word of advice. Don't go into business school.
Reply


Messages In This Thread
r00ster; for or against - was texhnolyze - by hbk101 - 06-24-2005, 07:53 PM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 6 Guest(s)