11-04-2004, 01:53 AM
kakomu Wrote:Liberalism is considered radical by people like you, since you guys are far too concerned with making money for yourself, shifting tax burden from yourself to people who actually work. I don't think republicans are hard working. They're 'old money', or the people that benefit from Bush's tax cuts, that is, the cuts that benefit people who live off of revenue from the market, bonds, stocks, shares, whatever. The debt is later shifted towards people like my mom and I who have to live off of income procured through work. My mom is an Market researcher for a large company and will not benefit at all from those taxes. As for your Broad generalizations, liberal economics is not about welfare for the poor, but being able to help those that need help, such as low income or unemplpyed people who can't find good or better jobs. The people that lost their jobs in that net loss of 800,000 people I mentioned earlier, would benefit from a democrat economic agenda more than Bush's tax cuts. Tax cuts don't mean much to people who have no job.
Wow, what biased crap. It's actually a proven fact that almost all rich people worked for their money. Very few people inherit it. As for the rest... not even worth replying to. You have about as much idea of what a republican is as my college class democrats.