10-20-2004, 05:57 PM
that was aimed at Cidien, since he has no clue that 'minority' refers to <50%.
As for distrusting people, that's Hobbes' domain. He disrusts people which is why he supports an absolute monarchy. Locke on the other hand is all for bodies of government that the people control, and that's who the framers modeled their constitution after. But they were afraid of the almost anarchistic popular tyranny.
As for personal favorites, I like LBJ. As for Carter, unlike Either bush or Reagan, he's actually useful after the fact. Bush and Reagan were useless after they left office.
As for distrusting people, that's Hobbes' domain. He disrusts people which is why he supports an absolute monarchy. Locke on the other hand is all for bodies of government that the people control, and that's who the framers modeled their constitution after. But they were afraid of the almost anarchistic popular tyranny.
As for personal favorites, I like LBJ. As for Carter, unlike Either bush or Reagan, he's actually useful after the fact. Bush and Reagan were useless after they left office.