10-10-2004, 12:00 PM
"Reason 1: He lied about Iraq having WMD which wouldn't be such a bad thing if he just admitted it but no, he now changes the reason to Saddam being a bad man (BTW, there are waaaay more people in the world now who think Bush is worse than Saddam, me not being one of them but still). Then I think, what about all the other bad men and opressed people? Oh well, They didn't have beef with your dad and they have no oil. That explains it."
Iraq had WMD's. Theres a lot of evidence that Saddam moved them before the invasion, but not enough to prove it. Bush HAS admitted that Saddam had no WMD's and he regrets using that faulty intelligence. Kerry, btw, had access to the same intelligence as Bush and came to the same conclusions. So how is Kerry better?
You can't take all the bad men in the world on at the same time. Yes, I think Saddam was first in line because we rely on that region for oil. Is this wrong? Would you rather we say screw our interests, we're starting with the place that's the least beneficial to us! Once again, the U.N. doesn't care about what's right most the time. They are the ones that are supposed to stick up for those smaller nations when they are being slaughtered, but they don't.
Calling Bush worse than Saddam is retarded. Saddam acted much like Hitler on a smaller scale. Had he had access to the resources Hiter did, I doubt Saddam would have been any better. I know you didn't say this, but people that do make me angry.
"Reason 2: In the 'war on terror' invading Iraq was one of the worst moves ever. You're figting an ideal, a way of thinking. This way of thinking has gotten infinetly more followers all over the world by invading Iraq. Way more people are prepared to fight against the US now (look at all the foreign terrorists in Iraq if your news bing you this info) than after 911 when the whole world sided with america. Bush has not gotten rid of terrorists, he created new ones"
Really? Where are all these new terrorists coming from? I've already addressed this. Yes, I could very well be wrong. However, I don't think sitting back and doing nothing will help anybody. There will still be terrorists and they will still want to kill us. May as well go after them instead of waiting for them to come to us.
"I watch the debates and the one thing I notice most is Kerry 's giving the people lots of plans and Bush is only talking about how Kerry's plans will fail and repeating the same thing over and over. He hardly presents any plans of his own. He not trying to win votes, he's only trying to take them away from Kerry it seems."
Kerry may as well write a theme song called "Not Bush". Don't feel like going off on this again but most of the votes Kerry will be getting in the election will be coming from people who just want anyone but Bush. I wonder what % of Kerry voters will be able to give a real reason why they voted for him. =/
Bush has not lied. Please, point out a lie to me. The only "lies" people show me are pure speculation. Bush is human, he makes mistakes. In fact, Kerry made most of them alongside Bush then made a lot more against Bush later. Kerry is the one who should be ashamed of how he's acted during our war on terror. He's hardly been better than during the Cold War. He sure was on the right side of history then...
Iraq had WMD's. Theres a lot of evidence that Saddam moved them before the invasion, but not enough to prove it. Bush HAS admitted that Saddam had no WMD's and he regrets using that faulty intelligence. Kerry, btw, had access to the same intelligence as Bush and came to the same conclusions. So how is Kerry better?
You can't take all the bad men in the world on at the same time. Yes, I think Saddam was first in line because we rely on that region for oil. Is this wrong? Would you rather we say screw our interests, we're starting with the place that's the least beneficial to us! Once again, the U.N. doesn't care about what's right most the time. They are the ones that are supposed to stick up for those smaller nations when they are being slaughtered, but they don't.
Calling Bush worse than Saddam is retarded. Saddam acted much like Hitler on a smaller scale. Had he had access to the resources Hiter did, I doubt Saddam would have been any better. I know you didn't say this, but people that do make me angry.
"Reason 2: In the 'war on terror' invading Iraq was one of the worst moves ever. You're figting an ideal, a way of thinking. This way of thinking has gotten infinetly more followers all over the world by invading Iraq. Way more people are prepared to fight against the US now (look at all the foreign terrorists in Iraq if your news bing you this info) than after 911 when the whole world sided with america. Bush has not gotten rid of terrorists, he created new ones"
Really? Where are all these new terrorists coming from? I've already addressed this. Yes, I could very well be wrong. However, I don't think sitting back and doing nothing will help anybody. There will still be terrorists and they will still want to kill us. May as well go after them instead of waiting for them to come to us.
"I watch the debates and the one thing I notice most is Kerry 's giving the people lots of plans and Bush is only talking about how Kerry's plans will fail and repeating the same thing over and over. He hardly presents any plans of his own. He not trying to win votes, he's only trying to take them away from Kerry it seems."
Kerry may as well write a theme song called "Not Bush". Don't feel like going off on this again but most of the votes Kerry will be getting in the election will be coming from people who just want anyone but Bush. I wonder what % of Kerry voters will be able to give a real reason why they voted for him. =/
Bush has not lied. Please, point out a lie to me. The only "lies" people show me are pure speculation. Bush is human, he makes mistakes. In fact, Kerry made most of them alongside Bush then made a lot more against Bush later. Kerry is the one who should be ashamed of how he's acted during our war on terror. He's hardly been better than during the Cold War. He sure was on the right side of history then...