What Cars Do You All Drive?

[Zagatto]

Originally posted by kakomu
zag, the links I posted are strictly car statistics that are pulled from manf. stats.

http://auto.consumerguide.com/auto/used/ and edmunds.com are both reputable places to research cars, which is where i researched my information.

sound domain is where people go to brag about their cars, not where information is swapped or archived. Posting a used car salesman's pitch? You might as well be talking to a 2 bit salesman with a plaid suit.

Kak, I didn't see the links you posted for the stats so I went and did some searching. Neither Consumerguide or Edmunds talk about anything other than HP and weight. I was unable to find anything from either of those sites about 1/4 mile times or even 0-60 accelleration.

Doing a bit more research I was able to confirm that the '94 Concorde shares the LH platform with the Intrepid and Vision and that all three cars were indeed offered with the 3.5L 214HP engine. Unfortunately, all of the indepth reviews are on the 3.3L engine and only talk about the awesome accelleration of the 3.5 in passing. And none of the reviews I looked at have 0-60 times or 1/4 mile times. I guess I just don't know where to look.

And what are you going on about with your 2 bit salesman stuff? I provided three links from respectable auto manufacturers and an auto columnist for MSN.

So where does this leave us?
I stand by my statement that RWD is safer than FWD in the hands of a skilled driver.
I believe that Robojacks daddy's car does have 214 HP and would be a match for your 125HP EX in a straight run (although you would feed him exhaust on a road handling course).

You say that you are providing me with sound arguments but when I check your references I have been unable to find the information that you claim is there. Please tell me where to look so I can see the error of my ways.

BTW... here's ONE LINK about the Intrepid (which is just a rebadge of the Concorde) having the 3.5L engine.

I usually get along with you on most topics but on this one I still believe you're wrong and none of the "evidence" you've provided yet holds up under scrutiny and your weak attack on my sources just reinforces my belief that you don't have a leg to stand on.