03-25-2004, 11:16 PM
All you get is to feel good about yourself and know that you help shape the purchases of other people. The best part is that other people will contribute as well and help shape your purchases.
I personally try to make a point of sitting down and banging out a reasonable review as soon as I've watched something. I'll even do an interim review if there's information that may help people before I've finished watching a series (which reminds me that I have to finish watching PataPata Airship soon).
I like the idea of rewarding people who write good quality reviews but think it would be very hard to determine who those people are because "good quality" is a subjective term. Then this circles back to the question: what makes a review good? I can point to Peter's reveiws as some of the best I've read but I don't think that people need to go to the extreme that he does to make a good review.
I personally try to make a point of sitting down and banging out a reasonable review as soon as I've watched something. I'll even do an interim review if there's information that may help people before I've finished watching a series (which reminds me that I have to finish watching PataPata Airship soon).
I like the idea of rewarding people who write good quality reviews but think it would be very hard to determine who those people are because "good quality" is a subjective term. Then this circles back to the question: what makes a review good? I can point to Peter's reveiws as some of the best I've read but I don't think that people need to go to the extreme that he does to make a good review.
Gullible isn't in the dictionary.