We are going a little different tangent here from the thread subject.
Anyway, I don't know why you say evolution is not proven?!?!?!?! Of course, nothing is 100% proven, but we humans are pretty good at deducing from known facts. The known facts suggests the progressive change of humanoid skull shapes. First from Ape like Ostralo Pythecus (spell?) to Homo Habilis to Homo Eractus to Cromagnon men to present day Homo Sapiens (a lot more in between) appears. Obvously different species cannot come out of nowhere overnight and these progressive changes shows that one comes from the other. Otherwise there are no other way to explain presence of these diffenerent skull shapes. Only other way to interpret this is one species became extinct and the other appeared as a toally new species, which is quite implausible. From this, we can only dedcut that there is slow variation in skull shape over time. Unless other evidence prove otherwise, this is the best dedcution and most widely accepted theory we have and hence excepted as scientific knowlege. That's how our court system works, too. The court deduces from known facts and determine whether a person is guilty or not. If a person is found to be guilty, does that mean it is 100% proven? Of course not. But we accept it as a truth based on evidence and deduction.
On the other hand, creationists have not come up with more rational explanation or evidence that can override evolution theory. It does not mean that it should be dismissed. But until it could be further proved with known facts rather than blind faith, it should be taught in religious studies. Famous inventor painter Galileo Galilei was once percecuted by christians for saying earth revolves around the sun. They laughed at him and forced him to appologize publicly for his lying, but now we accepted it as scientific truth because we believe it to be the most rational explanation. No one can actually see earth going around the sun. It sure does look like sun going around the earth, but known facts suggests otherwise.
Summary: we accept most likely scenario as science, which is evolution, not creationism.
edit: As for Big bang theory, it's not the same thing. The scientific community has not accepted it as a truth based upon hard facts but rather, only a mere speculation at this point.
Anyway, I don't know why you say evolution is not proven?!?!?!?! Of course, nothing is 100% proven, but we humans are pretty good at deducing from known facts. The known facts suggests the progressive change of humanoid skull shapes. First from Ape like Ostralo Pythecus (spell?) to Homo Habilis to Homo Eractus to Cromagnon men to present day Homo Sapiens (a lot more in between) appears. Obvously different species cannot come out of nowhere overnight and these progressive changes shows that one comes from the other. Otherwise there are no other way to explain presence of these diffenerent skull shapes. Only other way to interpret this is one species became extinct and the other appeared as a toally new species, which is quite implausible. From this, we can only dedcut that there is slow variation in skull shape over time. Unless other evidence prove otherwise, this is the best dedcution and most widely accepted theory we have and hence excepted as scientific knowlege. That's how our court system works, too. The court deduces from known facts and determine whether a person is guilty or not. If a person is found to be guilty, does that mean it is 100% proven? Of course not. But we accept it as a truth based on evidence and deduction.
On the other hand, creationists have not come up with more rational explanation or evidence that can override evolution theory. It does not mean that it should be dismissed. But until it could be further proved with known facts rather than blind faith, it should be taught in religious studies. Famous inventor painter Galileo Galilei was once percecuted by christians for saying earth revolves around the sun. They laughed at him and forced him to appologize publicly for his lying, but now we accepted it as scientific truth because we believe it to be the most rational explanation. No one can actually see earth going around the sun. It sure does look like sun going around the earth, but known facts suggests otherwise.
Summary: we accept most likely scenario as science, which is evolution, not creationism.
edit: As for Big bang theory, it's not the same thing. The scientific community has not accepted it as a truth based upon hard facts but rather, only a mere speculation at this point.