Quote:Originally posted by Ka-Talliya
Indeed, Vicious. There isn't much talk about a Jihad anymore. Osama had called for one, but after we dropped a few bombs people lost that battle cry.
The only thing Jihad any more are the mice that infest the Military camps in Iraq. These are fanatical mice that aren't scared of anything. It's scary!
That's what I'm trying to tell you guys. There was NEVER a Jihad to talk about. they're using the term Jihad for their own purposes. Even if Osama had gone to war, it would not have been a Jihad. there is nothing holy about anything him nor Saddam did.
If the US were to go out and start committing genocide, like Hitler did, except on muslims, then you might have to worry about a holy war starting. This crap about everyone throwing around the term 'Jihad' is just that. And somehow it always gets associated with these terrorist idiots. and thats not the idea behind the term at all. A Jihad has nothing to do with bombing the twin towers or anything like that.
Most people don't know what a Jihad really is. they only know what they hear in the media or from dumbasses like Saddam or Osama. So the term really gets a bad rep and gets thrown around anytime some terrorist idiot does something.
Easiest way I can explain it is if I started throwing around the word Armageddon. It can't be armageddon everyday. Everytime someone shoots someone or bombs something, it's not Armageddon. Nor can 1 guy (except for maybe Bush deciding to Nuke half the planet) start Armageddon by himself because he feels like it. that's basically what you guys and the media keep doing with 'Jihad'. It will only happen once, and it is a 'holy war'. so I hope you guys keep that in mind next time you hear the term 'Jihad' and stop relating it to Saddam, Osama, Iraq, or any other recent current events.